The 1976 Copyright Act provides for the
termination of copyright transfers – but creators need to act within a limited
timeframe. Copyright creators are entitled to reclaim their copyrights regardless
of any contract stating otherwise after certain time periods. Therefore, even if an author, artist, musician,
photographer or songwriter signed a contract which purports to transfer all
rights in a work for perpetuity, the Copyright Act provides that the author of
the work can terminate that grant and demand that the rights revert. Authors
and creators are now entitled to terminate their contractual transfers and
demand back control of their copyrights; authors can terminate their book
publishing contracts, songwriters can demand return of their musical
compositions from music publishers and recording artists and record producers
can demand return of their sound recordings from the record companies.
There is, however, a limited time to act. The
author must send a notice for a termination date within a five-year window
(starting at the end of 56 years for pre-1978 copyrights transfers and after 35 years
for transfers made after January 1, 1978), or the right to terminate is lost
forever. Time is running out for many copyrights. For example, as of 2017 the
right to terminate everything from 1978 through 1979 (e.g., 1978+35+5) as well
as copyrights transferred prior to 1956 (e.g., 1956+56+5) is disappearing.
According to the law, for copyright grants
made on or after January 1,
1978 (the effective date of the 1976 Copyright Act) the termination
period is 35 years under Section 203 of the Copyright Act. For pre-1978 works Section
304(c) of the Copyright Act, says that a copyright owner (or his or her heirs)
can terminate all grants, licenses or transfers of beginning on the 56th year
after that assignment was made. Termination may be exercised anytime during a 5
year period beginning at the end of either the 35 year or 56 year period from
the execution of the grant or, if the pre-1978 grant concerns the right of
publication of the work, then the period begins on the sooner of 35 years after
publication or 40 years after execution of the grant. Although there are certain
formalities which must be complied with to effectuate transfer, this essentially
means that recording artists and songwriters were entitled to start exercising
their right of termination on post-1978 works as of the start of 2013.
In the recorded music industry the
big exception to the termination right is if a work was done as a
"work-for-hire.” Section 101 of
the Copyright Act of 1976 delineates what types of works by their nature are incontestably
works for hire. It is essentially a two part test: (1) was the work created by
an employee within the scope of his or her employment, and; (2) if not, is it
(a) one of the nine enumerated work-for-hire classes of works and (b) is there
a written agreement signed by the author acknowledging the work for hire
relationship. Included on the list of nine enumerated categories of works for
hire are compilations, motion pictures and some other categories of media. Not
included on this list are books, photographs, songs and sound recordings.
There are
ongoing legal battles over how termination rights affect the book, comic book
and motion picture fields. Not unexpectedly, in the music business the record
companies as well as the music publishers are not pleased with the copyright
termination provision and the inevitable ramifications thereof. With respect to
songs and music publishers, some litigation has already been decided. In Scorpio
Music S.A. v. Willis (Case No. 11 CV 1557
(C.D. CA 2012), California Federal District Judge Moskowitz
determined that original Village People member, Victor Willis, could terminate
his transfers and recapture a direct copyright interest in many of his group's
songs, including "YMCA." In this case, after Willis notified
Scorpio that he was terminating the prior transfers, Scorpio sued arguing that
Willis could not terminate because a majority of each song's authors had not
also agreed to terminate their transfers. The court sided with Willis, ruling
that an author can unilaterally terminate the transfer of his share in a
copyrighted work without his co-writers. Willis stands to become the undivided
owner of a one-half to one-third interest in 33 song copyrights.
Although the Scorpio decision
addressed a fairly narrow point concerning multi-author transfers, the decision
opens the way for most songwriters to get their composition copyrights returned
and sets the stage for the bigger battles looming on the recorded music side of
the business. The copyright termination procedures apply to the separate and
equally lucrative sound recording copyrights transferred to record labels as
part of typical recording artist contracts over the years. Since the term
“sound recordings” is not explicitly contained in the enumerated categories
list, practitioners representing record companies will need to try to find
other ways to justify any claim that sound recordings are indeed works for hire
in order to preclude termination by artists.
The termination rights of the author of a
copyrighted work are generally subject to a 5 year window. Termination must be made
effective within the termination window or the right to terminate the grant is forfeited.
To be effective, the author must serve a written notice of termination on the
original record company or publisher (and/or any successors) no more than 10
and no less than 2 years prior to the effective date stated in the notice. The
notice of termination must state the effective date of termination. Perfection
of the termination requires that a copy of the written notice also be filed
with the U.S. Copyright Office prior to the effective date of termination.
Although the termination rights of an
artist under the 1976 Copyright Act would only be effective for the U.S. territory, the size of the U.S. consumer
market still makes this a valuable right to reclaim. As they saying goes, speak now or forever hold your peace!
Wallace
Collins is a New York
lawyer practicing primarily in the areas of entertainment, copyright, trademark
and internet law. He was a recording artist for Epic Records before attending Fordham Law School .
T:(212)661-3656; www.wallacecollins.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.